MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.021

Медицинская библиотека · Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2024

Editorial Commentary: Biceps Management During Rotator Cuff Tear: Confounding Variables Result in Unclear Indications.

Miller Matthew, Feldman Michael D

Редакционная статьяКомментарийПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Is "killing the biceps" during rotator cuff repair a capital crime or a lawful act? One of the most passionately debated topics in shoulder surgery is what to do with the biceps during rotator cuff repair: save it, tenotomize it, or perform tenodesis. Results of repair are not very successful, and given that repair of massive rotator cuff tears shows a 40% to 57% failure rate, there is renewed interest in sparing the biceps tendon as a humeral head depressor-or so that it may be used as a local graft for revision rotator cuff repair. The literature regarding tenodesis versus biceps sparing during rotator cuff repair is controversial. There are so many confounding variables affecting rotator cuff repair outcomes (tear size, comorbidities, age, tissue quality, etc.) that we do not believe that anything less than a randomized, prospective study that matches groups is likely to provide a conclusive verdict.

Для цитирования: Miller Matthew, Feldman Michael D. Editorial Commentary: Biceps Management During Rotator Cuff Tear: Confounding Variables Result in Unclear Indications.. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.