MedElevator
Войти в исследования Surgical endoscopy · 2019
Minimally invasive treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistula: a transanal endoscopic surgery study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuan Xiaoqi, Chen Hong, Chen Chunqiu, Yang Muqing, Li Qiwei, Gao Renyuan, Wu Xiaocai, Xu Weiwei, Sun Jing, Yin Lu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) is extremely difficult. No standard surgical procedure is accepted worldwide. The aim of this article was to evaluate a minimally invasive procedure for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistula.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas (located in the lower or middle one-third of the vaginal wall) at our center between August 2016 and October 2018. The anal approach was adopted for 12 patients: 6 patients were treated directly by rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF) with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), while the other 6 patients underwent initial TES exploration followed by RMAF procedure under direct vision. The vaginal approach was adopted for 5 patients: 3 patients were treated under TES directly and the other 2 were treated under direct vision after initial TES exploration. A total of 9 (52.94%) patients received diverting ileostomy-5 anal approach patients and 4 vaginal approach patients.
RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 46 years (range 10-76 years), and median BMI was 21.9 (range 17.9-28.1). Median operative time was 75 min (range 60-120 min), and median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 6-15 days). Recurrence was seen in 3/12 anal approach patients vs. 0/5 vaginal approach patients. Both the median preoperative and the median postoperative Wexner score were 0 (range 0-2). The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 2-24). No severe complications occurred in any patient.
CONCLUSION: The TES procedure for the treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas avoids any incision of the abdomen and perineal area and appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. This minimally invasive technique is still evolving and is likely to gain wide acceptance in the near future.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 17 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for the repair of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas (located in the lower or middle one-third of the vaginal wall) at our center between August 2016 and October 2018. The anal approach was adopted for 12 patients: 6 patients were treated directly by rectal mucosal advancement flap (RMAF) with transanal endoscopic surgery (TES), while the other 6 patients underwent initial TES exploration followed by RMAF procedure under direct vision. The vaginal approach was adopted for 5 patients: 3 patients were treated under TES directly and the other 2 were treated under direct vision after initial TES exploration. A total of 9 (52.94%) patients received diverting ileostomy-5 anal approach patients and 4 vaginal approach patients.
RESULTS: Median age of the patients was 46 years (range 10-76 years), and median BMI was 21.9 (range 17.9-28.1). Median operative time was 75 min (range 60-120 min), and median duration of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 6-15 days). Recurrence was seen in 3/12 anal approach patients vs. 0/5 vaginal approach patients. Both the median preoperative and the median postoperative Wexner score were 0 (range 0-2). The median follow-up time was 8 months (range 2-24). No severe complications occurred in any patient.
CONCLUSION: The TES procedure for the treatment of mid-low rectovaginal fistulas avoids any incision of the abdomen and perineal area and appears to be a safe and feasible procedure. This minimally invasive technique is still evolving and is likely to gain wide acceptance in the near future.