BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025
The role of sagittal axis in biceps tenodesis for superior capsular reconstruction in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kilinc Bekir Eray, Bilgin Emre, Eren Olcay, Oc Yunus, Yilmaz Baris
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare histopathological results following a 6-week postoperative follow-up of biceps tenodesis (BT) at 1/3 median, 1/3 posterior, and 1/3 anterior locations to the rotator cuff footprint (RCF) in cases of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty rabbits were assigned to three groups. BT for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was performed on rabbits 1-10 at the 1/3 median part of the RCF along the sagittal axis using a transosseous reinforced suture with the modified Mason-Allen technique, maintaining consistent pressure in the groove (Group 1). In rabbits 11-20 (Group 2), tenodesis was performed 1/3 posterior to the RCF, while rabbits 21-30 (Group 3) underwent tenodesis 1/3 anterior to the RCF. Following the 6-week follow-up, the shoulders were excised en bloc, and histopathological evaluation was conducted using a modified Bonar's scale. Results were statistically compared among the groups.
RESULTS: The level of cell morphology was significantly lower in Group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). The extracellular matrix level was also significantly lower in Group 2 compared to the others (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in collagen levels across Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p > 0.05), nor in cellularity levels among the groups (p > 0.05). General score evaluation levels were significantly lower in Group 2 than in the other groups (p < 0.05).
DICSUSSION: BT performed on the 1/3 posterior part of the RCF demonstrated greater success compared to procedures conducted at the 1/3 median and 1/3 anterior locations for MIRCT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty rabbits were assigned to three groups. BT for superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was performed on rabbits 1-10 at the 1/3 median part of the RCF along the sagittal axis using a transosseous reinforced suture with the modified Mason-Allen technique, maintaining consistent pressure in the groove (Group 1). In rabbits 11-20 (Group 2), tenodesis was performed 1/3 posterior to the RCF, while rabbits 21-30 (Group 3) underwent tenodesis 1/3 anterior to the RCF. Following the 6-week follow-up, the shoulders were excised en bloc, and histopathological evaluation was conducted using a modified Bonar's scale. Results were statistically compared among the groups.
RESULTS: The level of cell morphology was significantly lower in Group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). The extracellular matrix level was also significantly lower in Group 2 compared to the others (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in collagen levels across Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p > 0.05), nor in cellularity levels among the groups (p > 0.05). General score evaluation levels were significantly lower in Group 2 than in the other groups (p < 0.05).
DICSUSSION: BT performed on the 1/3 posterior part of the RCF demonstrated greater success compared to procedures conducted at the 1/3 median and 1/3 anterior locations for MIRCT.