MedElevator
Войти в исследования Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2011
[Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the prostate: a case report and review of the literature].
Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Hui-Hui, Sun Shao-Ming, Zu Xiong-Bing, Qi Lin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To discuss the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) of the prostate.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a case of IMT of the prostate and reviewed relevant literature. The patient was a 62-year-old man, who was twice referred to the local hospital for recurrence of dysuria. He was diagnosed as with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and twice underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). But frequent recurrence of dysuria followed postoperatively, for which he came to our hospital and received another TURP and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Pathological findings showed chronic inflammation of the bladder, papillary hyperplasia with mild dysplasia in regional urothelial and IMT of the prostate. Six months later, the patient came again to our hospital for recurrence of dysuria. Computed tomography revealed a large mass in the bladder.
RESULTS: The patient underwent laparoscopic bladder radical resection and ileal conduit diversion, simultaneously with pelvic lymph node dissection. The pathological examination confirmed it to be an IMT of the prostate with the bladder but not regional lymph nodes involved. An 11-month follow-up showed neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION: IMT of the prostate is a rare borderline lesion, whose diagnosis is very difficult and mainly depends on pathological findings. IMT of the prostate is liable to recur and even invade the bladder. Radical resection is recommended for patients with large and recurrent tumors, and close follow-up is strongly warranted.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a case of IMT of the prostate and reviewed relevant literature. The patient was a 62-year-old man, who was twice referred to the local hospital for recurrence of dysuria. He was diagnosed as with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and twice underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). But frequent recurrence of dysuria followed postoperatively, for which he came to our hospital and received another TURP and transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Pathological findings showed chronic inflammation of the bladder, papillary hyperplasia with mild dysplasia in regional urothelial and IMT of the prostate. Six months later, the patient came again to our hospital for recurrence of dysuria. Computed tomography revealed a large mass in the bladder.
RESULTS: The patient underwent laparoscopic bladder radical resection and ileal conduit diversion, simultaneously with pelvic lymph node dissection. The pathological examination confirmed it to be an IMT of the prostate with the bladder but not regional lymph nodes involved. An 11-month follow-up showed neither local recurrence nor distant metastasis.
CONCLUSION: IMT of the prostate is a rare borderline lesion, whose diagnosis is very difficult and mainly depends on pathological findings. IMT of the prostate is liable to recur and even invade the bladder. Radical resection is recommended for patients with large and recurrent tumors, and close follow-up is strongly warranted.