MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Military medicine · 1998

Clinical and radiological management of wartime eye and orbit injuries.

Janković S, Zuljan I, Sapunar D, Buća A, Plestina-Borjan I

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to present our experience in treating 191 patients with eye and orbit injuries that occurred during the war in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological management of wartime eye and orbit injuries in patients hospitalized at Clinical Hospital Split.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of the war eye and orbit injuries were caused by fragments of explosive devices, 9.9% by high-velocity missiles, and 8.4% by other objects. Most of the patients were admitted to the hospital within 24 hours of injury. The total number of injured globes was 222; 48.2% of globes had intrabulbar (mostly magnetic) foreign bodies, and 13% had extrabulbar intraorbital foreign bodies. Extensive wounds (perforation, double perforation, rupture, and evisceration/ enucleation) were encountered in 74% of patients, and 26% of patients had slight trauma. There was a statistically significant correlation between admission within the first 12 hours and postoperative visual acuity (Chi 2 = 3.93; p = 0.0474).

CONCLUSION

Along with clinical examination, computed tomography is the most important diagnostic procedure in preoperative evaluation of various forms of globe and orbit injuries. The admission time is the most important factor in determining postoperative visual acuity.

Для цитирования: Janković S, Zuljan I, Sapunar D, Buća A, Plestina-Borjan I. Clinical and radiological management of wartime eye and orbit injuries.. Military medicine. 1998.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.