Foot & ankle international · 2025
Percutaneous Zadek Osteotomy vs Open Haglund Resection for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: Early Outcomes and Complication Rates.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiriluk Sarah Hall, Vulcano Ettore, Schipper Oliver N, Kaplan Jonathan R M, Johnson A Holly, Ventresca Heidi, Gauthier Chase, Davis Harley T, Harrison Preston, Lewis Thomas, Lam Peter, Jackson J Benjamin, Gonzalez Tyler A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is difficult to manage despite multiple surgical options. Two of the surgical options include an open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection and a percutaneous Zadek osteotomy (ZO). The current study compared the patient-reported outcomes and complications of open vs percutaneous procedures in patients with IAT ± Haglund deformity.
METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent either an open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection or percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity at a single institution with minimum 12 months' follow-up was performed. Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and complications were recorded for each patient and compared between cohorts.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were treated with an open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection and 34 patients were treated with a percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity. PROMIS function (P < .001), pain (P < .001), and mobility (P < .001) scores significantly improved in patients who received either procedure. In the open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection cohort, a significant increase in wound complications (11/43, 25.6%) was observed in comparison to the percutaneous ZO group (1/34, 2.9%; P = .007).ConclusionBoth techniques yielded clinically meaningful improvements in PROMIS scores. In this modest retrospective cohort, the percutaneous ZO was associated with fewer minor wound complications; however, this observation should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size, short follow-up, and potential selection bias.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent either an open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection or percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity at a single institution with minimum 12 months' follow-up was performed. Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and complications were recorded for each patient and compared between cohorts.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were treated with an open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection and 34 patients were treated with a percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity. PROMIS function (P < .001), pain (P < .001), and mobility (P < .001) scores significantly improved in patients who received either procedure. In the open midline Achilles tendon-splitting Haglund resection cohort, a significant increase in wound complications (11/43, 25.6%) was observed in comparison to the percutaneous ZO group (1/34, 2.9%; P = .007).ConclusionBoth techniques yielded clinically meaningful improvements in PROMIS scores. In this modest retrospective cohort, the percutaneous ZO was associated with fewer minor wound complications; however, this observation should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size, short follow-up, and potential selection bias.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.