MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0950268806007151

Медицинская библиотека · Epidemiology and infection · 2006

Capture-recapture analysis to estimate the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease in Germany, 2003.

Schrauder A, Claus H, Elias J, Vogel U, Haas W, Hellenbrand W

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Germany in 2003 was estimated by the two-source capture-recapture method. As a unique personal identifier was unavailable, cases with IMD tested at the National Reference Centre for Meningococci (NRZM) were matched with cases reported to the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) through the statutory surveillance system by using demographic and disease-specific variables common to both datasets. The estimated overall incidence was 1.1 IMD cases/100,000 inhabitants, with a sensitivity of ascertainment of 64.8% for NRZM and 89.4% for RKI. Case-fatality rate was estimated at 8.8%. Adjustment for heterogeneity of capture according to age, region and serogroup observed in the NRZM (but not RKI) source had minimal effect on the estimated incidence. The IMD incidence estimated by capture-recapture analysis is thus only slightly higher than through statutory surveillance data. As a degree of positive dependence between the systems cannot be ruled out, this estimate may still be an underestimate. However, under ascertainment appears insufficient to explain the low incidence of IMD in Germany compared to other European countries.

Для цитирования: Schrauder A, Claus H, Elias J, Vogel U, Haas W, Hellenbrand W. Capture-recapture analysis to estimate the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease in Germany, 2003.. Epidemiology and infection. 2006. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268806007151.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.