Results of using the method of full extraperitoneal endoscopically assisted ligation of the hernial sac with inguinal hernia in children.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new technique for inguinal hernia repair in children: pediatric hernia extra-peritoneal ligation and percutaneous suturing (PHELPS) in comparison with another laparoscopic technique, subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL).

METHODS

We demonstrate the results of laparoscopic treatment of 680 patients with inguinal hernias. Of these, 206 patients were operated using the new PHELPS technique. The remaining 474 children received the SEAL technique. The difference between the methods is that PHELPS consists of ligating the hernia around the neck of the hernial sac, including an intra-peritoneal component (aponeurosis and muscles), while the SEAL technique ligates the hernia sac only. We examined whether this factor may lead to more recurrence and hydrocele in the SEAL technique.

RESULTS

Both groups of patients were comparable in terms of age, body weight at the time of surgery, and gender. The average total duration of inguinal herniorraphy, including the time of surgery in patients with one-and two-sided hernia localization, was comparable in both groups (17.50 min versus 17.22 min; p = 0.518). The study demonstrated a faster recovery of patients after using the PHELPS technique for the treatment of inguinal hernias, consisting in a statistically significantly lower number of doses of postoperative analgesia (1.01 versus 1.31; p < 0.001) and a shorter time of patient stay in the hospital (8.06 h versus 8.78 h; p = 0.031). Despite the fact that there were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of postoperative hydrocele (0 versus 6; p = 0.090), we found a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of recurrence (0 versus 17; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PHELPS technique shows improved results in terms of recurrence and hydrocele as compared to SEAL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study.