Pediatric emergency care · 2020
Surgical Emphysema in a Pediatric Tertiary Referral Center.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Harrison Rebecca, Knowles Stuart, Doherty Catherine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Laryngeal trauma in pediatrics is extremely rare; however, because of the smaller pediatric larynx, it can have catastrophic consequences. Following laryngeal trauma, surgical emphysema is a relatively common presentation. In pediatrics, it can be a life-threatening condition. Here we describe 2 cases of laryngeal trauma resulting in extensive surgical emphysema.
CASES: The first case described involves bilateral pneumothoraces, airway compromise, and respiratory arrest and was managed with bilateral chest drains, intubation, and tracheostomy. The second case resulted in widespread surgical emphysema in a stable patient and was managed conservatively. Both cases were monitored closely for a period of time to ensure there were no further sequelae.
DISCUSSION: Patients with laryngeal trauma resulting in surgical emphysema have the potential to deteriorate rapidly. Furthermore, surgical emphysema degrades the quality of ultrasound images, which may delay the diagnosis. If there are any concerns about the safety of the airway, then it should be secured definitively with either endotracheal intubation or emergency tracheostomy depending on clinical judgment. It is acceptable to monitor patients closely in a high-dependency unit setting if they are stable and do not show any evidence of laryngeal edema.
CONCLUSIONS: We present 2 cases of laryngeal trauma that were dealt with effectively so that both patients made a full recovery. It is important to act quickly to secure the airway if there are any concerns about its patency. Stable patients with no evidence of laryngeal edema can be managed conservatively. Close monitoring is essential to prevent any potential airway compromise.
CASES: The first case described involves bilateral pneumothoraces, airway compromise, and respiratory arrest and was managed with bilateral chest drains, intubation, and tracheostomy. The second case resulted in widespread surgical emphysema in a stable patient and was managed conservatively. Both cases were monitored closely for a period of time to ensure there were no further sequelae.
DISCUSSION: Patients with laryngeal trauma resulting in surgical emphysema have the potential to deteriorate rapidly. Furthermore, surgical emphysema degrades the quality of ultrasound images, which may delay the diagnosis. If there are any concerns about the safety of the airway, then it should be secured definitively with either endotracheal intubation or emergency tracheostomy depending on clinical judgment. It is acceptable to monitor patients closely in a high-dependency unit setting if they are stable and do not show any evidence of laryngeal edema.
CONCLUSIONS: We present 2 cases of laryngeal trauma that were dealt with effectively so that both patients made a full recovery. It is important to act quickly to secure the airway if there are any concerns about its patency. Stable patients with no evidence of laryngeal edema can be managed conservatively. Close monitoring is essential to prevent any potential airway compromise.