Single-Site Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Versus Modified Transumbilical Two-Port Laparoscopic Suturing of the Hernia Sac for the Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Different Approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) and modified transumbilical two-port laparoscopic suturing (M-TTLS) of the hernia sac for the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) and determine whether one approach was superior to another.

METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2017, a total of 599 children had undergone SLPEC or M-TTLS in our department. SLPEC and M-TTLS were the most frequently performed single-site laparoscopic procedures for PIH in our department, which represented the extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches, respectively. All patients were followed up at the out-patients' clinics and the medical records were reviewed with respect to all operative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 412 patients undergoing SLPEC and 187 patients undergoing M-TTLS, of which 358 hernias were on the right side, 172 on the left and 69 bilaterally. Two hundred and thirty-one unilateral hernias with contralateral patent processus vaginalis underwent contralateral repair at the same session. Mean operation time was 10.81 minutes in unilateral repair and 17.00 minutes in bilateral repairs, respectively. The perioperative complications included minor extraperitoneal hematoma in four (0.44%) patients, recurrence in one (0.11%), hydrocele in five (0.56%), and contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia in three (1.00%). No other complication developed in either group. There was no significant difference of complications between the two approaches except for the longer operation time in M-TTLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLPEC and M-TTLS were the safe and effective methods for PIH. The complications were comparable for M-TTLS and SLPEC, but operation time was significantly longer in M-TTLS than in SLPEC.