Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2003
An audit of post-splenectomy prophylaxis--are we following the guidelines?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramachandra Jyothi, Bond Amanda, Ranaboldo Charles, Cullis Jonathan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Asplenic individuals have major difficulties coping with specific infections (e.g. Streptococcus pneumoniae). This is an audit to look at a district general hospital's compliance with published guidelines for immunisations and antibiotic prophylaxis post-splenectomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of hospital records of consecutive splenectomy patients from January 1996 to March 2001.
RESULTS: Of 76 patients, 72% were vaccinated (30/76 with pneumococcal, HIB and meningococcal vaccines, 15/76 with Pneumovax and HIB, 10/76 with Pneumovax only), 63% were discharged on prophylactic antibiotics, and 81% of surviving patients had adequate communication with the GP regarding splenectomy. Patients undergoing non-elective splenectomy were less likely to be vaccinated or receive prophylactic antibiotics when compared with elective splenectomy patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Results are comparable with other published studies, but are still unsatisfactory for many splenectomy patients. Vaccination rates must be improved and more information given to patients and GPs to allow for appropriate follow-up care.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of hospital records of consecutive splenectomy patients from January 1996 to March 2001.
RESULTS: Of 76 patients, 72% were vaccinated (30/76 with pneumococcal, HIB and meningococcal vaccines, 15/76 with Pneumovax and HIB, 10/76 with Pneumovax only), 63% were discharged on prophylactic antibiotics, and 81% of surviving patients had adequate communication with the GP regarding splenectomy. Patients undergoing non-elective splenectomy were less likely to be vaccinated or receive prophylactic antibiotics when compared with elective splenectomy patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Results are comparable with other published studies, but are still unsatisfactory for many splenectomy patients. Vaccination rates must be improved and more information given to patients and GPs to allow for appropriate follow-up care.