MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/adc.85.1.6

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood · 2001

Neurodevelopmental outcome in meningococcal disease: a case-control study.

Fellick J M, Sills J A, Marzouk O, Hart C A, Cooke R W, Thomson A P

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: To determine long term neurodevelopmental outcome following the spectrum of meningococcal infection.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 1990, 152 cases of meningococcal disease were recruited; 139 survived. Between 1998 and 1999, 115 survivors (83%) were evaluated, together with 115 sex and age matched controls. Standard measures of neurological function, coordination, cognition, behaviour, and hearing were used to assess neurodevelopmental status.

RESULTS

One case has spastic quadriplegia. Gross neurological examination was normal in all other cases and all controls. Five cases and no controls have significant hearing loss. Cases performed at a lower level than controls on measures of coordination, cognition, and behaviour. Four cases and no controls had major impairments. The adjusted odds ratios for moderate and minor impairments were 3.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 10.3) and 1.6 (95% CI 0.8 to 3.4) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The majority of survivors from this cohort do not have gross neurological deficits. However, when objective measures of motor function, cognitive ability, and behaviour were applied significant detriments were found in meningococcal survivors.

Для цитирования: Fellick J M, Sills J A, Marzouk O, Hart C A, Cooke R W, Thomson A P. Neurodevelopmental outcome in meningococcal disease: a case-control study.. Archives of disease in childhood. 2001. DOI: 10.1136/adc.85.1.6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.