Lancet (London, England) · 2003
Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cowan Frances, Rutherford Mary, Groenendaal Floris, Eken Paula, Mercuri Eugenio, Bydder Graeme M, Meiners Linda C, Dubowitz Lilly M S, de Vries Linda S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The role of intrapartum asphyxia in neonatal encephalopathy and seizures in term infants is not clear, and antenatal factors are being implicated in the causal pathway for these disorders. However, there is no evidence that brain damage occurs before birth. We aimed to test the hypothesis that neonatal encephalopathy, early neonatal seizures, or both result from early antenatal insults.
METHODS: We used brain MRI or post-mortem examination in 351 fullterm infants with neonatal encephalopathy, early seizures, or both to distinguish between lesions acquired antenatally and those that developed in the intrapartum and early post-partum period. We excluded infants with major congenital malformations or obvious chromosomal disorders. Infants were divided into two groups: those with neonatal encephalopathy (with or without seizures), and evidence of perinatal asphyxia (group 1); and those without other evidence of encephalopathy, but who presented with seizures within 3 days of birth (group 2).
FINDINGS: Brain images showed evidence of an acute insult without established injury or atrophy in 197 (80%) of infants in group 1, MRI showed evidence of established injury in only 2 infants (<1%), although tiny foci of established white matter gliosis, in addition to acute injury, were seen in three of 21 on post-mortem examination. In group 2, acute focal damage was noted in 62 (69%) of infants. Two (3%) also had evidence of antenatal injury.
INTERPRETATION: Although our results cannot exclude the possibility that antenatal or genetic factors might predispose some infants to perinatal brain injury, our data strongly suggest that events in the immediate perinatal period are most important in neonatal brain injury.
METHODS: We used brain MRI or post-mortem examination in 351 fullterm infants with neonatal encephalopathy, early seizures, or both to distinguish between lesions acquired antenatally and those that developed in the intrapartum and early post-partum period. We excluded infants with major congenital malformations or obvious chromosomal disorders. Infants were divided into two groups: those with neonatal encephalopathy (with or without seizures), and evidence of perinatal asphyxia (group 1); and those without other evidence of encephalopathy, but who presented with seizures within 3 days of birth (group 2).
FINDINGS: Brain images showed evidence of an acute insult without established injury or atrophy in 197 (80%) of infants in group 1, MRI showed evidence of established injury in only 2 infants (<1%), although tiny foci of established white matter gliosis, in addition to acute injury, were seen in three of 21 on post-mortem examination. In group 2, acute focal damage was noted in 62 (69%) of infants. Two (3%) also had evidence of antenatal injury.
INTERPRETATION: Although our results cannot exclude the possibility that antenatal or genetic factors might predispose some infants to perinatal brain injury, our data strongly suggest that events in the immediate perinatal period are most important in neonatal brain injury.