MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010337

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2012

Analysis of utilization patterns of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the Medicare population.

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Pampati Vidyasagar, Hirsch Joshua A

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pattern of utilization of vertebral augmentation procedures including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty of the lumbar and thoracic spine in the Medicare population in the USA.

METHODS

This analysis was performed using a standard 5% national sample of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician outpatient billing claims from 2001 to 2008 and the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master File for 2009 and 2010. Overall characteristics of utilization patterns for vertebral augmentation procedures were evaluated using multiple variables.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2010, vertebroplasty procedures decreased overall by 24.6% with an average annual decrease of 3.5% per 100 000 Medicare population; from 2006 to 2010 the declines were 42.4% overall and 12.9% annually. From 2006 to 2010, kyphoplasty procedures increased overall by 0.8% with an annual average increase of 0.2% per 100 000 Medicare population.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of growth patterns of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the Medicare population from 2002 to 2010 illustrates a lack of growth of kyphoplasty and a decline in vertebroplasty procedures.

Для цитирования: Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Pampati Vidyasagar, Hirsch Joshua A. Analysis of utilization patterns of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the Medicare population.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010337.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.