MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.002

Медицинская библиотека · Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2024

Medial Opening Wedge Versus Lateral Closing Wedge (LCW) High Tibial Osteotomies for Knee Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis Show Similar Outcomes and Survivorship, While Medial Opening Wedge Has Higher Rates of Tibial Fracture and LCW Has Higher Rates of Nerve Injury and Conversion to Total Knee.

Tollefson Luke V, Lee Dustin, Keel Taidhgin, LaPrade Christopher M, LaPrade Robert F

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications between medial opening wedge (MOW) and lateral closing wedge (LCW) high tibial osteotomies (HTOs) in the setting of medial compartment osteoarthritis with genu varus alignment.

METHODS

This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Studies that reported on MOW or LCW HTOs in the setting of medial compartment osteoarthritis were included. Analysis was performed based on radiographic and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included. Hip-knee-ankle angles and PROs, including Lysholm and visual analog scale, showed significant improvements postoperatively for both MOW and LCW HTO for all included studies. For the studies that reported on it, posterior tibial slope (PTS) was significantly increased in 4 of the 9 MOW studies and significantly decreased in 8 of the 9 LCW studies. Patellar height was significantly decreased in 4 of the 5 MOW studies, while none of the 4 LCW studies reported any changes. Three comparison studies reported a higher conversion to total knee arthroplasty in the LCW cohort; otherwise, survivorship at 10 years was comparable between studies. The MOW cohort had higher rates of tibial fractures, while the LCW cohort had higher rates of nerve injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found comparable hip-knee-ankle angle correction and PROs between patients undergoing MOW or LCW HTOs to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis. Survivorship at 10 years was comparable between MOW and LCW HTOs; however, some MOW and LCW HTO comparison studies reported higher conversion to total knee arthroplasty for LCW HTO. Medial opening wedge HTO typically results in an increased PTS, decreased patellar height, and tibial fractures, while LCW HTO typically results in decreased PTS, no change in patellar height, and common peroneal nerve injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Для цитирования: Tollefson Luke V, Lee Dustin, Keel Taidhgin, LaPrade Christopher M, LaPrade Robert F. Medial Opening Wedge Versus Lateral Closing Wedge (LCW) High Tibial Osteotomies for Knee Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis Show Similar Outcomes and Survivorship, While Medial Opening Wedge Has Higher Rates of Tibial Fracture and LCW Has Higher Rates of Nerve Injury and Conversion to Total Knee.. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.