MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078336

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2013

Methods for identifying Neisseria meningitidis carriers: a multi-center study in the African meningitis belt.

Basta Nicole E, Stuart James M, Nascimento Maria C, Manigart Olivier, Trotter Caroline, Hassan-King Musa, Chandramohan Daniel, Sow Samba O, Berthe Abdoulaye, Bedru Ahmed, Tekletsion Yenenesh K, Collard Jean-Marc, Jusot Jean-François, Diallo Aldiouma, Basséne Hubert, Daugla Doumagoum M, Gamougam Khadidja, Hodgson Abraham, Forgor Abudulai A, Omotara Babatunji A, Gadzama Galadima B, Watkins Eleanor R, Rebbetts Lisa S, Diallo Kanny, Weiss Noel S, Halloran M Elizabeth, Maiden Martin C J, Greenwood Brian

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Detection of meningococcal carriers is key to understanding the epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis, yet no gold standard has been established. Here, we directly compare two methods for collecting pharyngeal swabs to identify meningococcal carriers.

METHODS

We conducted cross-sectional surveys of schoolchildren at multiple sites in Africa to compare swabbing the posterior pharynx behind the uvula (U) to swabbing the posterior pharynx behind the uvula plus one tonsil (T). Swabs were cultured immediately and analyzed using molecular methods.

RESULTS

One thousand and six paired swab samples collected from schoolchildren in four countries were analyzed. Prevalence of meningococcal carriage was 6.9% (95% CI: 5.4-8.6%) based on the results from both swabs, but the observed prevalence was lower based on one swab type alone. Prevalence based on the T swab or the U swab alone was similar (5.2% (95% CI: 3.8-6.7%) versus 4.9% (95% CI: 3.6-6.4%) respectively (p=0.6)). The concordance between the two methods was 96.3% and the kappa was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.73), indicating good agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

These two commonly used methods for collecting pharyngeal swabs provide consistent estimates of the prevalence of carriage, but both methods misclassified carriers to some degree, leading to underestimates of the prevalence.

Для цитирования: Basta Nicole E, Stuart James M, Nascimento Maria C, Manigart Olivier, Trotter Caroline, Hassan-King Musa, Chandramohan Daniel, Sow Samba O, Berthe Abdoulaye, Bedru Ahmed, Tekletsion Yenenesh K, Collard Jean-Marc, Jusot Jean-François, Diallo Aldiouma, Basséne Hubert, Daugla Doumagoum M, Gamougam Khadidja, Hodgson Abraham, Forgor Abudulai A, Omotara Babatunji A, Gadzama Galadima B, Watkins Eleanor R, Rebbetts Lisa S, Diallo Kanny, Weiss Noel S, Halloran M Elizabeth, Maiden Martin C J, Greenwood Brian. Methods for identifying Neisseria meningitidis carriers: a multi-center study in the African meningitis belt.. PloS one. 2013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078336.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.