Neuropediatrics · 2019
Transtemporal Ultrasound (US) Assessment of Third Ventricle Diameter (TVD): Comparison of US and MRI TVD in Pediatric Patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kerscher Susanne R, Schweizer Louise L, Nägele Thomas, Bevot Andrea, Alber Michael, Schuhmann Martin U
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In a retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based study, we showed that changes of the third ventricle diameter (TVD) are a reliable mirror of changes of the entire ventricular system. The third ventricle is easily accessible in more than 90% of children and adults using ultrasound (US) via the transtemporal bone-window; thus it can be assessed quickly and free of radiation. In order to use transtemporal US determination of TVD instead of MRI/CT in clinical practice, it is important to know if there is a correlation and bias between both methods, which is addressed in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: This prospective study investigates 122 children (newborn-18 years). Diagnoses encompassed hydrocephalus (50%), tumors (14.8%), and other intracranial pathologies (35.2%). US-based TVD was measured via the transtemporal bone-window using a phased array 1 to 4MHz transducer. Results were compared with TVD measured on simultaneously acquired axial T1-weighted axial MRI or computed tomography (CT) scans.
RESULTS: Overall mean values for TVD were 6.56 ± 5.84 and 6.47 ± 5.64 mm for US and MRI, respectively. There was an outstanding correlation between TVD measured by MRI and US (r = 0.991, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.096 mm with limits of agreement of -0.99 and 1.18 mm.
CONCLUSION: US- and MRI-based TVD measurements correlate excellently and measure almost identical TVD values. US-based TVD is in mean ∼0.096 mm larger than MRI-based TVD due to a more angulated measurement plane. US is equal to the gold-standard MRI, a fact, opening new avenues for US-based TVD as a first-line assessment tool of ventricular width.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: This prospective study investigates 122 children (newborn-18 years). Diagnoses encompassed hydrocephalus (50%), tumors (14.8%), and other intracranial pathologies (35.2%). US-based TVD was measured via the transtemporal bone-window using a phased array 1 to 4MHz transducer. Results were compared with TVD measured on simultaneously acquired axial T1-weighted axial MRI or computed tomography (CT) scans.
RESULTS: Overall mean values for TVD were 6.56 ± 5.84 and 6.47 ± 5.64 mm for US and MRI, respectively. There was an outstanding correlation between TVD measured by MRI and US (r = 0.991, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.096 mm with limits of agreement of -0.99 and 1.18 mm.
CONCLUSION: US- and MRI-based TVD measurements correlate excellently and measure almost identical TVD values. US-based TVD is in mean ∼0.096 mm larger than MRI-based TVD due to a more angulated measurement plane. US is equal to the gold-standard MRI, a fact, opening new avenues for US-based TVD as a first-line assessment tool of ventricular width.