MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.04.007

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2013

Incidence and patterns of mandibular fractures during a 5-year period in a London teaching hospital.

Rashid Arif, Eyeson Josiah, Haider Diana, van Gijn Daniel, Fan Kathleen

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We retrospectively evaluated mandibular fractures in patients who presented to a London teaching hospital between June 2005 and May 2010. A total of 1261 patients sustained 1994 mandibular fractures (mean 1.6, range 1-5). The incidence of mandibular fracture was higher in male patients (87%) than in females (13%) (male:female ratio 6.6:1), and the peak incidence was during the third decade for both genders. The most common site of fracture was the angle (30%), followed by the parasymphysis (27%), and condyle (27%). Overall, interpersonal violence was the most common cause (72%) followed by falls (18%). In male patients, the most common cause was interpersonal violence (77%); in females it was a fall (46%). The anatomical sites of fracture reflected their cause. Interpersonal violence typically resulted in fractures of the angle (36%) while road traffic accidents and falls resulted in condylar fractures (28% and 53%, respectively). A total of 66 (5%) patients sustained other maxillofacial fractures and 37 (3%) presented with non-maxillofacial fractures. Our findings are consistent with trends reported in other urban centres.

Для цитирования: Rashid Arif, Eyeson Josiah, Haider Diana, van Gijn Daniel, Fan Kathleen. Incidence and patterns of mandibular fractures during a 5-year period in a London teaching hospital.. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.04.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.