DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162490
PediBIG: Optimizing the Brain Injury Guideline for Pediatric Care.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The number of hospitalizations for traumatic brain injury is high with over 200,000 estimated in 2020 alone. With improvements in technology and care, some of these patients may have been able to avoid costly hospitalizations and unwarranted neurosurgical consultation. The Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) was developed in adults and re-examined in pediatrics to limit unwarranted admissions and consultations.
METHODS
Data from a retrospective cohort of patients identified from a single Level 1 Trauma Center over 10 years of time, were utilized to evaluate characteristics associated with need for hospitalization and/or neurosurgery consultation and examine the current Brain Injury Guideline for pediatrics. Relationships between patient and injury characteristics with need for neurosurgical consultation were examined using logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS
The 822 patients meeting inclusion were categorized post-hoc into BIG 1 (57, no need for admission or neurosurgical consult), 2 (448, need for admission, but no neurosurgical consult) and 3 (317, need for admission and neurosurgical consult). In the BIG 2 categorization, only 1 child needed neurosurgical intervention and 12 had some worsening on imaging. A number of factors investigated were statistically related to the need of the neurosurgical team, though non-displaced skull fractures were not (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
Data presented here is consistent with previous work in the development of the Brain Injury Guideline (BIG). Moving non-displaced skull fractures from the BIG 2 categorization to BIG 1 may avoid unwarranted admissions in pediatric brain injury patients.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, diagnostic test/criteria.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.