MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of urology · 2009

Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Nayyar Rishi, Gupta Narmada P, Hemal Ashok K

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty for complicated cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).

METHODS

Complicated UPJO cases included patients with the following: concomitant multiple or calyceal stones, secondary UPJO (post-ureteroscopy, open or percutaneous surgery), malrotated kidney, horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, giant hydronephrosis, poorly functioning kidney (glomerular filtration rate <20 ml/min), non-redundant renal calyces (requiring nephroplication), ptosis of the kidney (requiring nephropexy), long stricture (>2 cm), age <5 or >60 years and duplex pelvis. All cases underwent dismembered robotic pyeloplasty. Data were collected for operative time, blood loss, stone clearance, analgesic usage and time to recovery. Follow-up was done with intravenous urography and dynamic renal scan.

RESULTS

A total of 29 cases underwent dismembered robotic pyeloplasty with an average operative time and blood loss of 130 min and 50 ml. Stone clearance could be achieved in 8 out of 10. The average follow-up period was 15 months with a symptomatic and objective success rate of 96.6% (28/29). No perioperative complications were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic pyeloplasty for complicated cases of UPJO is feasible, safe and effective, and has a durable success rate.

Для цитирования: Nayyar Rishi, Gupta Narmada P, Hemal Ashok K. Robotic management of complicated ureteropelvic junction obstruction.. World journal of urology. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0469-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.