Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2016
25-Gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal of glass and other intraocular foreign bodies.
Clinical StudyСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Singh Ramandeep, Kumar Abiraj, Gupta Vishali, Dogra Mangat R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip in removal of intraocular foreign bodies, including glass.
DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional study.
PARTICIPANTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients who underwent the procedure between January 2013 and April 2015.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 10 males and 1 female with a mean age of 31.27 ± 9.64 years (range 12-45 years). All eyes in which 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal of intraocular foreign body (IOFB) was done in a sutureless vitrectomy setup, irrespective of the nature of IOFB, were included. We excluded the participants with less than 6 months of postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal of IOFB. The secondary outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraoperative and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: There were iron (6), glass (2), wooden (1), pellet (1), and stone (1) IOFBs, for which 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal was done successfully. The mean BCVA in Snellen's decimal equivalent improved significantly from 0.14 ± 0.16 to 0.34 ± 0.36 with a mean follow-up of 12 months (range 6-24 months). Intraoperatively, drop of IOFB because of loss of vacuum was observed in 2 eyes. Postoperatively, cystoid macular edema with epiretinal membrane was seen in 1 eye. There were no other intraoperative and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip to assist removal of magnetic and nonmagnetic IOFBs is a feasible and reproducible procedure, and required instrumentation is readily available in present-day vitrectomy era.
DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional study.
PARTICIPANTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients who underwent the procedure between January 2013 and April 2015.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 10 males and 1 female with a mean age of 31.27 ± 9.64 years (range 12-45 years). All eyes in which 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal of intraocular foreign body (IOFB) was done in a sutureless vitrectomy setup, irrespective of the nature of IOFB, were included. We excluded the participants with less than 6 months of postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal of IOFB. The secondary outcome measures included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraoperative and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: There were iron (6), glass (2), wooden (1), pellet (1), and stone (1) IOFBs, for which 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip-assisted removal was done successfully. The mean BCVA in Snellen's decimal equivalent improved significantly from 0.14 ± 0.16 to 0.34 ± 0.36 with a mean follow-up of 12 months (range 6-24 months). Intraoperatively, drop of IOFB because of loss of vacuum was observed in 2 eyes. Postoperatively, cystoid macular edema with epiretinal membrane was seen in 1 eye. There were no other intraoperative and postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of 25-gauge active aspiration silicon tip to assist removal of magnetic and nonmagnetic IOFBs is a feasible and reproducible procedure, and required instrumentation is readily available in present-day vitrectomy era.