MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000076570

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric neurosurgery · 2004

Sledding accidents in children: potential for serious injury, risk of fatality.

Verrees Meg, Robinson Shenandoah, Cohen Alan R

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Though a pastime rarely considered rough or dangerous, sledding is not risk-free. The presentation of several serious injuries to Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital in Cleveland, Ohio, led us to examine our emergency department and admitting records to determine the incidence of neurological injury among children involved in sledding accidents. We discovered 24 children who had sustained brain or spine injuries as sequelae to sledding mishaps during a 5-year period. The ages ranged from 3 months to 15 years. Injuries included multiple skull fractures, 2 epidural hematomas, 1 subdural hematoma, 1 odontoid fracture and 1 anoxic brain injury. There was 1 death. Twenty-one of 24 patients incurred their injuries by colliding with fixed objects. Both improvised crafts and models intended for sledding were involved in the injuries. Only 3 sleds possessed steering capability. Eight of the 9 children who sustained a serious neurosurgical injury were supervised by an adult. Only 2 children had received instruction before sledding. The lack of awareness of the potential for injury together with the dearth of instruction and lack of control over a vehicle dashing down a hill studded with obstacles can change a carefree pastime into a hazardous activity.

Для цитирования: Verrees Meg, Robinson Shenandoah, Cohen Alan R. Sledding accidents in children: potential for serious injury, risk of fatality.. Pediatric neurosurgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1159/000076570.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.