MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3200/jach.56.2.119-128

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2007

College and university compliance with a required meningococcal vaccination law.

Castel Amanda D, Reed Greg, Davenport Marsha G, Harrison Lee H, Blythe David

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Maryland became the first state to pass a vaccination law requiring college and university students living on campus to obtain a meningococcal vaccination or to sign a waiver refusing vaccination because college students are at increased risk for disease. The authors sought to identify how Maryland colleges addressed the law and determine whether schools were in full compliance.

PARTICIPANTS

The authors surveyed 32 college/university administrators via a self-administered questionnaire.

METHODS

The authors calculated vaccination and waiver rates and assessed compliance with the law overall and with specific law components.

RESULTS

Among 28 participating schools, annual vaccination rates and waiver rates among students during 2000-2004 ranged from 66%-76% and 12%-17%, respectively. Two (7%) schools were compliant with all components of the law.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandatory vaccination laws do not ensure compliance at the college and university level. Mandatory reporting, increased education, and collaboration between colleges and universities and public health agencies are needed.

Для цитирования: Castel Amanda D, Reed Greg, Davenport Marsha G, Harrison Lee H, Blythe David. College and university compliance with a required meningococcal vaccination law.. Journal of American college health : J of ACH. 2007. DOI: 10.3200/jach.56.2.119-128.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.