Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances · 2017
Is Total Elbow Arthroplasty Safe as an Outpatient Procedure?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Albert Ben M, Lee Anna, McLendon Taylor W, Devereaux Randolph S, Odum Craig C, Foulkes Guy D
Аннотация
Ambulatory surgery centers are the preferred setting for many procedures formerly performed in a hospital setting. This study sought to determine whether outpatient total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is as safe as inpatient TEA. A retrospective analysis was performed of inpatient (IP) versus outpatient (OP) TEA by a single surgeon over a period of 18 years. Demographic, social, and comorbidity measures as well as complication rates were analyzed and stratified by IP or OP status. Bivariate comparison showed increased prevalence of coronary artery disease in the OP group (32% vs. 7%) and increased age in the IP group (68 years vs. 58 years). All other demographic, social, and comorbidity factors were comparable between the IP and OP groups, although more infections were seen in the IP group. The surgeons' initial learning curve occurred mostly within the IP group. Most important, no difference in complication rate was observed between the IP and OP groups.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresArthroplasty, Replacement, ElbowCase-Control StudiesComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseCubital Tunnel SyndromeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansJoint DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis FailureProsthesis-Related InfectionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective Studies