MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-011-2091-7

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2011

Comparison of efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction in Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Banerjee Ray Payal, Ray Amitabh, Chakraborti P S

Клиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate as an ovulation induction drug in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients of Indian origin.

METHOD: One hundred and forty seven infertile PCOS patients were randomly given letrozole (2.5 mg) (n = 69) or clomiphene (100 mg) (n = 78) from day 3 to day 7 of menstrual cycle, followed-up with transvaginal serial folliculometry from day 9. 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was administered when at least 1 ovarian follicle was ≥ 18 mm in size.

RESULTS

The pertinent results of the study are as follows: on the day of hCG injection, mean E2 level was significantly higher in the clomphene citrate group (817 ± 286.70 pg/ml) in comparison with letrozole group (444.03 ± 85.42 pg/ml). Mean endometrial development was 8.72 ± 1.41 mm in the letrozole and 8.78 ± 1.16 mm in the clomiphene group (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Letrozole has beneficial effect on endometrium, thereby potentially increasing pregnancy rates after successful ovulation induction in women with PCOS.

Для цитирования: Banerjee Ray Payal, Ray Amitabh, Chakraborti P S. Comparison of efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction in Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-2091-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.