Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013) · 2017
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcomes Following Open Sub-Pectoralis Major Biceps Tenodesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rossy William, McGee Alan, Shamah Steven, Lepkowsky Eric, Alaia Michael, Jazrawi Laith, Strauss Eric
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Traditionally, biceps tenotomy has been recommended for obese, older, and less active patient populations, while tenodesis is preferred in younger, thinner, and more active individuals. In an effort to better understand the impact obesity has on the surgical management of long head of the biceps tendinopathy, the current study analyzed the effect body mass index had on surgical outcomes following open subpectoralis major biceps tenodesis.
METHODS: Patients who underwent biceps tenodesis between June 2006 and December 2013 were identified from our institution's surgical database. They were then contacted to assess their functional outcomes using validated outcome measures. Comparisons were made between the outcomes seen in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese patients (BMI < 30) with subgroup analyses looking at gender, age, and length of follow-up.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients completed a follow-up assessment with a mean follow-up of 29.3 months. The non-obese cohort was composed of 84 patients with a mean BMI of 25.8. The obese cohort was composed of 38 patients with a mean BMI of 33.4. No significant difference was noted to be present with respect to postoperative outcome measures. Regression analysis with BMI as an independent variable demonstrated poor correlation with outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support open subpectoralis biceps tenodesis as an acceptable option for the treatment of LHB pathology irrespective of the treated patient's body mass index. Both obese and non-obese patients demonstrated low postoperative DASH scores and high Oxford Shoulder scores.
METHODS: Patients who underwent biceps tenodesis between June 2006 and December 2013 were identified from our institution's surgical database. They were then contacted to assess their functional outcomes using validated outcome measures. Comparisons were made between the outcomes seen in obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) and non-obese patients (BMI < 30) with subgroup analyses looking at gender, age, and length of follow-up.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients completed a follow-up assessment with a mean follow-up of 29.3 months. The non-obese cohort was composed of 84 patients with a mean BMI of 25.8. The obese cohort was composed of 38 patients with a mean BMI of 33.4. No significant difference was noted to be present with respect to postoperative outcome measures. Regression analysis with BMI as an independent variable demonstrated poor correlation with outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study support open subpectoralis biceps tenodesis as an acceptable option for the treatment of LHB pathology irrespective of the treated patient's body mass index. Both obese and non-obese patients demonstrated low postoperative DASH scores and high Oxford Shoulder scores.