MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2340/aos.v83.40570

Медицинская библиотека · Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024

Complications and complaints in craniofacial fractures - Finnish national data for 20 years.

Luotamo Inka, Snäll Johanna, Toivari Miika

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Research on reasons for malpractice claims in oral and maxillofacial surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and prevalence of permanent harm among craniofacial fracture related malpractice claims.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective register study was designed and implemented. All patients with a complaint and a diagnosis of facial or cranial fracture were included. The main outcome was the presence of permanent harm, and the predictor variable was the cause of complaint. Chi-square test was used for estimation of statistical significance.

RESULTS

Delay in correct diagnosis was the leading cause of malpractice claims (63.2%), and permanent harm was found in 23.1% of the population. 82.4% of injuries were facial fractures in total population. 65.3% (n = 98) of facial trauma were related with delayed diagnostics (p < 0.001). Permanent harm was more frequent in patients with delayed diagnosis (71.4%) than those without (60.7%, p = 0.299).

CONCLUSIONS

Claims of craniofacial trauma are related with under-diagnostics, and un-diagnosed facial fracture can lead to a high rate of permanent harm. Systematic clinical evaluation and facial trauma specialist consultation is recommended to set early correct diagnosis for and improve treatment of craniofacial trauma patients.

Для цитирования: Luotamo Inka, Snäll Johanna, Toivari Miika. Complications and complaints in craniofacial fractures - Finnish national data for 20 years.. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2024. DOI: 10.2340/aos.v83.40570.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.