MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/02688697.2018.1485874

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of neurosurgery · 2018

Reducing the radiation exposure from CT scanning in children with shunts: a nationwide survey and a departmental CT protocol.

Solth Anna, Mukerji Nitin, Strachan Roger

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Low dose ionising radiation such as from CT scans carries a low but cumulative risk of cancer and children are particularly sensitive. Children with VP Shunts often undergo multiple CT scans. We developed a CT protocol with reduced radiation for paediatric patients with shunts and compared it with the current practice in the other neurosurgical units in the UK and ROI by conducting a nationwide survey.

METHODS

An email questionnaire was send to the superintendent radiographer in every Neurosurgical unit in the UK and the ROI.

RESULTS

The response rate was 70%. Only 5 (19%) of the responding units used a dedicated CT shunt protocol with reduced radiation. Radiation was reduced by lowering the tube current. In comparison, our protocol uses a combination of less tube current and fewer slices. This reduced the radiation exposure of a CT head significantly with sufficient image quality to make a diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Radiation from CT for paediatric shunt patients scans can and should be reduced. This can be achieved by using reduced radiation protocols. A national paediatric CT shunt protocol could lead to significant reduction in effective radiation dose.

Для цитирования: Solth Anna, Mukerji Nitin, Strachan Roger. Reducing the radiation exposure from CT scanning in children with shunts: a nationwide survey and a departmental CT protocol.. British journal of neurosurgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1485874.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.