MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1287

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of public health · 1994

Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: a population-based study.

Lu-Yao G L, Baron J A, Barrett J A, Fisher E S

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to examine the patterns of treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fracture.

METHODS

A 5% national sample of Medicare claims was used to identify patients who sustained hip fractures between 1986 and 1989. In comparing treatment patterns across regions, direct standardization was used to derive age- and race-adjusted percentages. Logistic regression and Cox regression were used to examine short- and long-term survival.

RESULTS

In the United States, 64% of femoral neck fractures were treated with arthroplasty; 90% of pertrochanteric fractures were treated with internal fixation. Higher short- and long-term mortality was associated with being male, being older, residing in a nursing home prior to fracture, having a higher comorbidity score, and having a pertrochanteric fracture. Blacks and Whites had similar 90-day postfracture mortality, but Blacks had a higher mortality later on. For femoral neck fracture, internal fixation has a modestly lower short-term mortality associated with it than arthroplasty has.

CONCLUSION

Variation in the treatment of hip fracture was modest, The increased delayed mortality after hip fracture among Blacks requires further study.

Для цитирования: Lu-Yao G L, Baron J A, Barrett J A, Fisher E S. Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: a population-based study.. American journal of public health. 1994. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1287.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.