Die Pharmazie · 2025
Direct comparison of the effects of first- and second-generation H1 -receptor blockers on motor functions in mice.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taguchi K, Tenjin K, Sakamoto Y, Shimada A, Hara R, Iketani O, Okamoto Y, Enoki Y, Kizu J, Hori S, Matsumoto K
Аннотация
Histamine H1 receptor (H1R) antagonists are widely used to treat allergic reactions; however, their effects on the central nervous system can impair motor functions. This study investigated the impact of first-generation (diphenhydramine and d -chlorpheniramine) and second-generation (epinastine, ketotifen, bepotastine, and levocetirizine) H1R antagonists on motor functions in mice using activity wheel, balance beam, inclined screen, and rotarod tests. First-generation H1R antagonists significantly impaired motor functions, with diphenhydramine exerting stronger effects than those of d -chlorpheniramine. Among the second-generation agents, bepotastine and levocetirizine had minimal effects on all motor functions, whereas epinastine and ketotifen suppressed spontaneous movement, similar to first-generation H1R antagonists but had little effects on balance, postural stability, and coordinated movement. These findings provide valuable insights into the differential effects of first- and second-generation H1R antagonists on motor functions. These results highlight the importance of understanding individual profiles of H1R antagonists to minimize adverse effects, ensure patient safety, and improve quality of life.