DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000000564
An Algorithm for Forefoot Reconstruction With the Innervated Free Medial Plantar Flap.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Because of shearing forces, the forefoot is more prone to trophic ulcers than the heel. Reconstruction of trophic ulcers and other forefoot defects is a vexing challenge. We favor the innervated free medial plantar flap to replace like-with-like and confer protective sensation. We investigate the feasibility of this flap with the largest series to date and the first to describe ipsilateral flap transfer.
METHODS
Between 2009 and 2013, 7 patients with forefoot defects were treated with innervated free medial plantar flaps. The average age of 4 men and 3 women was 35.1 years (range, 8-50 years). Indications were secondary reconstruction after trauma and coverage of oncologic defects. The mean defect was 5 × 7 cm (range, 4-6 cm × 6-10 cm). Four patients were treated with contralateral flaps and 3 with ipsilateral flaps using interposition vein graft.
RESULTS
The mean flap size was 8.1 ± 1.6 cm × 5.9 ± 1.2 cm. There was no perioperative complication, venous congestion, or arterial insufficiency. Patients were followed clinically for 38.5 months (range, 6 months to 10 years). One patient died from complications of metastatic disease 7 months after plantar flap reconstruction. Two patients underwent sensory testing and gait analysis. The appearance was satisfactory, ambulation returned to normal, and there was protective sensation in every case. In 2 cases, hyperkeratotic tissue was excised in revision procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
The innervated free medial plantar flap is an attractive and feasible option for coverage of medium-to-large defects of the plantar forefoot in the hands of a skilled microsurgeon. It has a place in our algorithmic approach to forefoot reconstruction.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.