MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/315158

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of infectious diseases · 1999

The changing epidemiology of meningococcal disease in the United States, 1992-1996.

Rosenstein N E, Perkins B A, Stephens D S, Lefkowitz L, Cartter M L, Danila R, Cieslak P, Shutt K A, Popovic T, Schuchat A, Harrison L H, Reingold A L

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

New meningococcal vaccines are undergoing clinical trials, and changes in the epidemiologic features of meningococcal disease will affect their use. Active laboratory-based, population-based US surveillance for meningococcal disease during 1992-1996 was used to project that 2400 cases of meningococcal disease occurred annually. Incidence was highest in infants; however, 32% of cases occurred in persons >/=30 years of age. Serogroup C caused 35% of cases; serogroup B, 32%; and serogroup Y, 26%. Increasing age (relative risk [RR], 1.01 per year), having an isolate obtained from blood (RR, 4.5), and serogroup C (RR, 1.6) were associated with increased case fatality. Among serogroup B isolates, the most commonly expressed serosubtype was P1.15; 68% of isolates expressed 1 of the 6 most common serosubtypes. Compared with cases occurring in previous years, recent cases are more likely to be caused by serogroup Y and to occur among older age groups. Ongoing surveillance is necessary to determine the stability of serogroup and serosubtype distribution.

Для цитирования: Rosenstein N E, Perkins B A, Stephens D S, Lefkowitz L, Cartter M L, Danila R, Cieslak P, Shutt K A, Popovic T, Schuchat A, Harrison L H, Reingold A L. The changing epidemiology of meningococcal disease in the United States, 1992-1996.. The Journal of infectious diseases. 1999. DOI: 10.1086/315158.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.