Journal of pediatric orthopedics · 2024
Identifying Risk Factors for Open Reduction in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kolac Ulas Can, Oral Melih, Sili Mazlum Veysel, Ibik Serkan, Aydinoglu Hasan Samil, Bakircioglu Sancar, Yilmaz Guney
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common injuires of the elbow in children, often categorized by the Gartland classification. While type 1 and 2 fractures commonly managed conservatively, type 3 and 4 fractures typically require surgical treatment. Although closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have shown success, open reduction may be required in cases where adequate reduction cannot be achieved. This study aims to identify radiological and clinical risk factors associated with transitioning from closed reduction to open reduction in Gartland type 3 and 4 SCHF in children.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 159 patients operated on between 2014 and 2022 for Gartland type 3 and 4 SCHF. Parameters including age, gender, injury severity, time to surgery, neurovascular damage, medial spike angle, fracture-skin distance, medial-lateral deviation, rotation, fracture level, and Baumann angle were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 159 SCHF in children aged 3 to 12 years, classified as Gartland type 3 (106 patients, 66.6%) and type 4 (53 patients 33.4%), underwent surgical intervention. Notably, 46 patients (28.9%) initially managed with closed reduction exhibited failure, prompting the necessity for conversion to open reduction. Injury severity, lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, and low fracture tip-to-skin distance were found to be factors that could potentially increase the need for open reduction ( P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the low medial spike angle, flexion type injury, and low fracture type increased the likelihood of open surgery ( P <0.05). Sex, side, duration to surgery, and Baumann angle showed no significant associations.
CONCLUSIONS: SCHF commonly necessitate surgical intervention in children. Although the risk factors for failed closed reduction and the need for open surgery have been discussed in the literature, there is no consensus. Preoperative planning, particularly for patients with specific factors like lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, low fracture-to-skin distance and high injury severity, should consider potential open surgery requirements.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 159 patients operated on between 2014 and 2022 for Gartland type 3 and 4 SCHF. Parameters including age, gender, injury severity, time to surgery, neurovascular damage, medial spike angle, fracture-skin distance, medial-lateral deviation, rotation, fracture level, and Baumann angle were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 159 SCHF in children aged 3 to 12 years, classified as Gartland type 3 (106 patients, 66.6%) and type 4 (53 patients 33.4%), underwent surgical intervention. Notably, 46 patients (28.9%) initially managed with closed reduction exhibited failure, prompting the necessity for conversion to open reduction. Injury severity, lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, and low fracture tip-to-skin distance were found to be factors that could potentially increase the need for open reduction ( P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the low medial spike angle, flexion type injury, and low fracture type increased the likelihood of open surgery ( P <0.05). Sex, side, duration to surgery, and Baumann angle showed no significant associations.
CONCLUSIONS: SCHF commonly necessitate surgical intervention in children. Although the risk factors for failed closed reduction and the need for open surgery have been discussed in the literature, there is no consensus. Preoperative planning, particularly for patients with specific factors like lateral deviation, advanced age, low medial spike angle, low fracture-to-skin distance and high injury severity, should consider potential open surgery requirements.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.