Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2015
Does the early intensification of intrathecal therapy improve outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with CNS2/TLP+ status at diagnosis?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jastaniah Wasil, Elimam Naglla, Abdalla Khalid, Khattab Taha M, Felimban Sami, Abrar Mohammed B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether the addition of two extra intrathecal methotrexate (ITM) doses during induction in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients eliminate the prognostic significance of CNS2/TLP+ status.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 224 patients according to the central nervous system (CNS) involvement at diagnosis: CNS1, CNS2, or CNS3. Patients with CNS2/TLP+ received two additional ITM doses during induction. Patients were treated according to the Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-1991/1961 protocols between January 2001 and December 2007.
RESULTS: The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for the ALL patients in the CNS1, CNS2, and CNS3 groups were 80.4 ± 3.0, 100, and 73.5 ± 11.3%, respectively; a non-significant difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.063). However, the patients with CNS2 had significantly better survival compared with the CNS3 patients (P = 0.03). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates for the three groups were 17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-22.9), 0, and 18.8% (95% CI: 4.3-41.1), respectively; (P = 0.214) and those of isolated or combined CNS relapse were 9.6 (95% CI: 5.8-14.5), 0 and 6.3% (95% CI: 0.3-25.8), respectively (P = 0.424).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the intensification of ITM therapy during induction improves outcomes in patients with CNS2/TLP+ status and eliminates its prognostic significance. This suggests that early intensification using CNS-directed therapy is beneficial in controlling minimal CNS disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 224 patients according to the central nervous system (CNS) involvement at diagnosis: CNS1, CNS2, or CNS3. Patients with CNS2/TLP+ received two additional ITM doses during induction. Patients were treated according to the Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-1991/1961 protocols between January 2001 and December 2007.
RESULTS: The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates for the ALL patients in the CNS1, CNS2, and CNS3 groups were 80.4 ± 3.0, 100, and 73.5 ± 11.3%, respectively; a non-significant difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.063). However, the patients with CNS2 had significantly better survival compared with the CNS3 patients (P = 0.03). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates for the three groups were 17 (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-22.9), 0, and 18.8% (95% CI: 4.3-41.1), respectively; (P = 0.214) and those of isolated or combined CNS relapse were 9.6 (95% CI: 5.8-14.5), 0 and 6.3% (95% CI: 0.3-25.8), respectively (P = 0.424).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the intensification of ITM therapy during induction improves outcomes in patients with CNS2/TLP+ status and eliminates its prognostic significance. This suggests that early intensification using CNS-directed therapy is beneficial in controlling minimal CNS disease.