Viruses · 2025
BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy and Hemorrhagic Cystitis in Transplant Recipients-What We Understand and What Remains Unclear.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jaing Tang-Her, Wang Yi-Lun, Chang Tsung-Yen
Аннотация
The reactivation of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) during severe immunosuppression plays a crucial role in two significant syndromes observed in transplant recipients: BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in kidney transplant patients and BK polyomavirus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (BKPyV-HC) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This review aims to summarize the current understanding and lingering ambiguity by looking at three primary questions: (1) In cases with BKPyV-related illnesses in transplant patients, which diagnostic methods have the best track record of accuracy and success? (2) Which therapy approaches have the best track records of safety and efficacy in real-world clinical settings? (3) What can immunological research teach us about the development of future tailored treatments? Diagnosis involves the patient's appearance, ruling out other potential causes, and employing quantitative PCR to identify active viral replication in urine or plasma. BKPyV-HC can vary from self-limited hematuria to potentially fatal bleeding, while BKPyVAN may lead to loss and dysfunction of the allograft. Reducing immunosuppression remains the key aspect of treatment. However, the effectiveness of antivirals (such cidofovir and leflunomide) is not always the same, and supporting measures depend on the syndrome. Researchers are looking into new immunotherapies, such as virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. Due to the intricate viro-immunopathology and lack of defined treatment regimens, future initiatives should focus on prospective studies to establish validated thresholds, enhance management algorithms, and integrate immune surveillance into individualized therapy.