MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/230949901402200214

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2014

Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Ng Zhaowen Dennis, Krishna Lingaraj

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in terms of operating time, blood loss, pain, functional outcome, morbidity, and mortality.

METHODS

Medical records of 207 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture using a cemented (n=96) or cementless (n=111) prosthesis were reviewed. Postoperative thigh pain, ambulatory status, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The cemented group had significantly longer operating time (p=0.017) and greater intraoperative blood loss (p=0.024). Postoperative thigh pain was significantly higher in the cementless group (p=0.023).

CONCLUSION

Cementless hemiarthroplasty is preferred over cemented hemiarthroplasty because of reduced operating time and intra-operative blood loss. It was associated with increased postoperative thigh pain, but functional outcomes, complications, and mortality were similar between the 2 groups.

Для цитирования: Ng Zhaowen Dennis, Krishna Lingaraj. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/230949901402200214.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.