Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2022
Effects of paired stimulation with specific waveforms on cortical and spinal plasticity in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adeel Muhammad, Lai Chien-Hung, Lin Bor-Shing, Chan Wing P, Liou Jian-Chiun, Wu Chun-Wei, Peng Chih-Wei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Paired stimulation can cause neuroplasticity in corticospinal and spinal pathways in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to know the effects of different waveforms using paired stimulations with bicycling in subjects with a chronic SCI.
METHODS: Recruited subjects with an SCI underwent three treatment interventions in random order for 4-20 min followed by 30 min of bicycling (control, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rTMS) at 20 Hz with transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with tsDCS with a 1-week gap period. A TMS method was employed to record the resting motor threshold (RMT), the 90% values of which was used as the stimulation intensity, and the Hoffman (H)-reflex was measured by stimulating the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, MEP peak-to-peak amplitude, and H-reflex latency as primary variables and lower extremity motor scale (LEMS) and modified Ashworth spasticity scale (MAS) as secondary variables were analyzed before and after the interventions.
RESULTS: The MEP latency, MEP amplitude, and LEMS significantly improved with the rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS or the rTMS-20 Hz/tsDCS (p < 0.050) protocols compared to the control intervention. All other outcome measures, including RMT, H-reflex latency, and MAS score showed some changes but did not fully attain a level of significance.
CONCLUSION: The paired stimulation with rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS was equally effective to produce neuroplastic effect in subjects with chronic SCI compared to the conventional TMS-20 Hz/tsDCS intervention.
METHODS: Recruited subjects with an SCI underwent three treatment interventions in random order for 4-20 min followed by 30 min of bicycling (control, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rTMS) at 20 Hz with transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with tsDCS with a 1-week gap period. A TMS method was employed to record the resting motor threshold (RMT), the 90% values of which was used as the stimulation intensity, and the Hoffman (H)-reflex was measured by stimulating the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, MEP peak-to-peak amplitude, and H-reflex latency as primary variables and lower extremity motor scale (LEMS) and modified Ashworth spasticity scale (MAS) as secondary variables were analyzed before and after the interventions.
RESULTS: The MEP latency, MEP amplitude, and LEMS significantly improved with the rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS or the rTMS-20 Hz/tsDCS (p < 0.050) protocols compared to the control intervention. All other outcome measures, including RMT, H-reflex latency, and MAS score showed some changes but did not fully attain a level of significance.
CONCLUSION: The paired stimulation with rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS was equally effective to produce neuroplastic effect in subjects with chronic SCI compared to the conventional TMS-20 Hz/tsDCS intervention.