MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2026.04.045

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 2026

Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Flick Moritz, Müller Dominik X, Bergholz Alina, Sierzputowski Pawel, Eichlseder Michael, Saad Rami, Greiwe Gillis, Kouz Karim, Hapfelmeier Alexander, Saugel Bernd

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiac output monitoring is recommended for high-risk surgical patients and critically ill patients with circulatory shock. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies published since 2010 that compared minimally invasive pulse wave analysis-derived cardiac output or cardiac index measurements with reference measurements by pulmonary artery thermodilution or transpulmonary thermodilution in adult surgical or critically ill patients.

METHODS

In a random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated pooled estimates of the percentage error, mean difference and standard deviation, and 95% limits of agreement separately for studies reporting cardiac output or cardiac index. Subgroup analyses were performed by patient population and test device.

RESULTS

We included 92 studies divided into 113 data sets with a total of 3111 patients. For 71 data sets reporting cardiac output, the pooled percentage error (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) was 44.0% (38.2%-49.8%) with a mean difference (standard deviation) of -0.1 (1.3) L min-1 with 95% limits of agreement of -2.6 to 2.4 L min-1 (I2=9.8%). For 42 data sets reporting cardiac index, the pooled percentage error was 49.1% (40.6%-57.6%) with a mean difference of -0.1 (0.9) L min-1 m-2 with 95% limits of agreement of -1.8 to 1.6 L min-1 m-2 (I2=7.9%). The percentage error varied substantially across patient populations and devices. Overall risk of bias was low.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled percentage error between minimally invasive pulse wave analysis-derived cardiac output measurements of 44.0% (cardiac output) and 49.1% (cardiac index) in adult surgical or critically ill patients exceeds the 30% threshold for clinically acceptable agreement. However, the percentage error varied depending on the patient population and device used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD420251090806; submitted July 17, 2025).

Для цитирования: Flick Moritz, Müller Dominik X, Bergholz Alina, Sierzputowski Pawel, Eichlseder Michael, Saad Rami, Greiwe Gillis, Kouz Karim, Hapfelmeier Alexander, Saugel Bernd. Agreement of minimally invasive pulse wave analysis with pulmonary artery and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. British journal of anaesthesia. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2026.04.045.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.