Journal of pediatric surgery · 2025
Complications and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Cloacal Malformation After Bowel Neovagina Creation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Griffin Kristine L, Svetanoff Wendy Jo, Read Megan A, Srinivas Shruthi, Hewitt Geri, Wood Richard J, Kebodeaux Chelsea A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Up to 60 % of patients with a cloacal malformation have a Mullerian anomaly. In cases where the vagina is absent or cannot reach the perineum, an intestinal neovagina is often created. The complications and outcomes of this are not well described. We aimed to describe the gynecologic outcomes of patients who underwent neovagina creation followed at our institution.
METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of patients ≥8 years old with cloacal malformation who underwent intestinal neovagina creation was performed. Demographics, surgical history, short-term complications, and long-term gynecologic outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included. The median age at neovagina creation was 3.95 years (IQR 1.40, 7.61). Twelve patients (30 %) had uterine agenesis. Neovagina was colonic in 27 (67.5 %) and small bowel in 12 (30 %). Median age at most recent follow up was 9.7 years (IQR 7.6, 14.1). There was no difference in 30-day complications, incidence of vaginal prolapse, introital stenosis, or graft stenosis between those undergoing small bowel vs colonic neovagina. Two patients had documented menstrual obstruction, and 11 patients reported bothersome vaginal discharge. Of those with neovagina prolapse, one small bowel (8.3 %) and two colonic grafts (7.4 %) required prolapse repair. One small bowel (8.3 %) and 7 colonic (26 %) patients underwent introitoplasty for stenosis. Of the 3 patients having penetrative sex, 2 reported dyspareunia. No patients have become pregnant.
CONCLUSION: Bowel neovaginas remain a suitable choice for patients with cloacal malformations in whom the vagina is absent or cannot reach the perineum.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of patients ≥8 years old with cloacal malformation who underwent intestinal neovagina creation was performed. Demographics, surgical history, short-term complications, and long-term gynecologic outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included. The median age at neovagina creation was 3.95 years (IQR 1.40, 7.61). Twelve patients (30 %) had uterine agenesis. Neovagina was colonic in 27 (67.5 %) and small bowel in 12 (30 %). Median age at most recent follow up was 9.7 years (IQR 7.6, 14.1). There was no difference in 30-day complications, incidence of vaginal prolapse, introital stenosis, or graft stenosis between those undergoing small bowel vs colonic neovagina. Two patients had documented menstrual obstruction, and 11 patients reported bothersome vaginal discharge. Of those with neovagina prolapse, one small bowel (8.3 %) and two colonic grafts (7.4 %) required prolapse repair. One small bowel (8.3 %) and 7 colonic (26 %) patients underwent introitoplasty for stenosis. Of the 3 patients having penetrative sex, 2 reported dyspareunia. No patients have become pregnant.
CONCLUSION: Bowel neovaginas remain a suitable choice for patients with cloacal malformations in whom the vagina is absent or cannot reach the perineum.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.