Quality of life of children operated for bladder exstrophy.

INTRODUCTION

Bladder exstrophy is a rare malformation with functional and psychological issues affecting children's quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the urinary continence and the quality of life of patients operated for bladder exstrophy in our institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including fifteen patients operated for bladder exstrophy between 1995 and 2015. All patients underwent a physical examination and an interview with a psychiatrist. Urinary continence was evaluated by dryness periods. Quality of life was evaluated by the QoL SF-36 scale.

RESULTS

All patients underwent primary early bladder closure. Posterior osteotomy was performed initially in 6 cases, and during the redo surgery in 7 cases. Leakage was recorded in 4 cases, fistula in 9 patients. Twelve patients had one or more redo surgery. Final bladder closure success rate was of 80%. Additional continence surgical procedures were performed by a Young Dees technique in 8 cases and with bladder enlargement associated with Mitrofanoff continent derivation in 5 cases. Only two patients over fifteen did not use diapers. All the items of QoL score according SF-36 were under the normal value (75%) except physical functioning and physical limitation. These scores go worst with age. Scores were better for continent boys in both physical and psychological items, but the difference was not significant However, significant difference was observed between boys having less than 3 surgeries and those having more than three procedures. Psychological and social scores were better for girls than for boys and differences were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of urinary incontinence is high in children managed for bladder exstrophy. Boys are more affected than girls with subsequent psychological and social repercussions. In our study, quality of life depends more on number of surgery than continence results. Psychological problems should be screened early for accurate treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.