DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.108231
Child sexual abuse among women in Brazil: Prevalence and associated factors in urban and rural settings.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Child sexual abuse (CSA) remains a public health concern, but Brazilian population-based evidence on childhood abuse, familial violence, and victimization markers across life stages is limited.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined CSA prevalence and associated familial and adult violence-related markers in two Brazilian settings.
PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING
Data came from the Brazilian arm of the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence: 2645 women aged 15-49 years from São Paulo (n = 1172) and Zona da Mata de Pernambuco (n = 1473), surveyed in 2000-2001.
METHODS
Unconditional logistic regression, using a forward stepwise approach and complex-sampling correction, identified factors associated with CSA. Model 1 examined familial childhood-context markers; Model 2 examined markers reported at different life stages, including adult violence-related markers.
RESULTS
CSA prevalence was 7.7% in São Paulo and 4.7% in Pernambuco; 94.5% of perpetrators were male. In Model 1, maternal IPV was associated with CSA (OR = 2.34; 95% CI [1.58, 3.48]). In Model 2, CSA was associated with adult victimization markers, including physical IPV in São Paulo (OR = 3.40; 95% CI [1.17, 9.91]) and sexual IPV in Pernambuco (OR = 3.90; 95% CI [1.35, 11.31]); early sexual initiation was examined as a related life-course marker.
CONCLUSIONS
CSA was associated with familial and adult violence markers across life stages. These results support coordinated, trauma-informed, intersectoral approaches linking child protection, domestic violence responses, sexual and reproductive health, mental health, and clinical support services.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.