Confirmation of the safety of central venous catheterisation in critically ill infants and children--the Baragwanath experience.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate, in critically ill children, the safety and effectiveness of routine central venous catheterisations (CVCs) performed by residents from all disciplines.
DESIGN
Prospective audit of all CVCs over a 24-month period.
SETTING
Multidisciplinary intensive care unit at Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto.
PATIENTS: All critically ill patients 12 years of age or younger requiring CVC. All percutaneous sites (subclavian, internal jugular and femoral) were used; these were selected by the attending doctor and not influenced by the audit.
RESULTS
There were 272 catheterisation attempts, of which 241 (88.6%) were successful. Patient age and size but not disease severity influenced incidences of both catheterisation failure and minor bleeding. The latter was the commonest early complication, occurring in 63 (23.2%) successful catheterisations. There were 7 major complications-3 pneumothoraces, 2 tachyarrhythmias and 2 major bleeds, all with subclavian vein catheterisation. Catheter-related infections (CRIs) occurred in 85 (51.2%) of 166 lines and catheter-related septicaemia (CRS) in 10 (5.7%) of 175 lines where there were sufficient data for evaluation. No patient or line factor, including duration of insertion, influenced CRI or CRS. In CRI, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the commonest organism. Other common CRI isolates were Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella spp. and Candida albicans. Six different organisms were implicated in CRS.
CONCLUSIONS
CVC is a safe procedure with a high success rate. The femoral vein is the recommended percutaneous site of choice as it carries no great risk of sepsis and does not expose the patient to the hazard of intrathoracic complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.