Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2014
Percutaneous balloon dilation of severe pulmonary valve stenosis in patients with cyanosis and congestive heart failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tefera Endale, Qureshi Shakeel A, Bermudez-Cañete Ramón, Rubio Lola
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This article reports outcomes of percutaneous balloon dilation in patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis, in particular in those treated late with cyanosis, congestive heart failure, and pericardial effusion.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous balloon dilation is the treatment of choice for pulmonary valve stenosis. Although earlier intervention may produce better results, patients may present late with congestive heart failure and cyanosis.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients who underwent pulmonary valve balloon dilation, were grouped into two groups, based on the presence or absence of congestive right heart failure and/or central cyanosis. Group I included 33 patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis, but without clinical evidence of congestive right heart failure in the form of liver enlargement, raised jugular venous pressure, and peripheral edema and/or central cyanosis and group II included 22 patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis and congestive right heart failure and/or central cyanosis. Their outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Doppler measured transvalvar pressure gradient decreased from 110.2 ± 34.0 mm Hg before to 52.5 ± 28.7 mm Hg in group I after dilation (P < 0.001), and from 138.4 ± 32.3 mm Hg to 53.9 ± 19.3 mm Hg in group II, (P < 0.001). Complications included ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in three patients and severe bradycardia in one patient in group II. Twelve patients in group II developed clinical and radiologic evidence of reperfusion injury/pulmonary edema within the first 24 hr of intervention and needed ventilation for 2-9 days. Three of these patients died from intractable pulmonary edema. On follow up, clinical and echocardiographic improvement parameters were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Those patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis with congestive right heart failure, especially those with pericardial effusion, ascites and cyanosis, represent an important technical and clinical challenge. They are a high-risk group with or without treatment. If they survive the procedure, they may still remain at a high risk in the first few days afterward. Maintaining their ventilator and inotropic support after balloon dilation may increase survival. However, excellent results can be obtained.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous balloon dilation is the treatment of choice for pulmonary valve stenosis. Although earlier intervention may produce better results, patients may present late with congestive heart failure and cyanosis.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients who underwent pulmonary valve balloon dilation, were grouped into two groups, based on the presence or absence of congestive right heart failure and/or central cyanosis. Group I included 33 patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis, but without clinical evidence of congestive right heart failure in the form of liver enlargement, raised jugular venous pressure, and peripheral edema and/or central cyanosis and group II included 22 patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis and congestive right heart failure and/or central cyanosis. Their outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Doppler measured transvalvar pressure gradient decreased from 110.2 ± 34.0 mm Hg before to 52.5 ± 28.7 mm Hg in group I after dilation (P < 0.001), and from 138.4 ± 32.3 mm Hg to 53.9 ± 19.3 mm Hg in group II, (P < 0.001). Complications included ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in three patients and severe bradycardia in one patient in group II. Twelve patients in group II developed clinical and radiologic evidence of reperfusion injury/pulmonary edema within the first 24 hr of intervention and needed ventilation for 2-9 days. Three of these patients died from intractable pulmonary edema. On follow up, clinical and echocardiographic improvement parameters were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Those patients with severe pulmonary valve stenosis with congestive right heart failure, especially those with pericardial effusion, ascites and cyanosis, represent an important technical and clinical challenge. They are a high-risk group with or without treatment. If they survive the procedure, they may still remain at a high risk in the first few days afterward. Maintaining their ventilator and inotropic support after balloon dilation may increase survival. However, excellent results can be obtained.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultBalloon ValvuloplastyChildChild, PreschoolCyanosisEchocardiography, DopplerFemaleHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansInfantMalePericardial EffusionPulmonary EdemaPulmonary Valve StenosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult