MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1353/cpr.2026.a993190

Медицинская библиотека · Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2026

Engaging the National Youth Football Community in a Child Sexual Abuse Research Advisory Board.

Amendola Alyssa, Bright Melissa, Ortega Diana

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

While research advisory boards are common in community-based research, there are challenges with forming a board on sensitive topics and among communities who are less often engaged in research such as youth football organizations.

OBJECTIVES

We share our processes for forming a national board, challenges associated with engaging some football community members, and feedback from our board members.

METHODS

Board members were recruited with a multidisciplinary team of youth football organization employees. Researchers compared demographic characteristics of interested individuals who joined the board to those who did not.

LESSONS LEARNED: Board members were different in several ways to those who did not participate. Additionally, board members experienced minimal harm from participating in discussions on sensitive topics.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several interested individuals joined the board, more than one-half of the interested individuals did not. It is important for researchers to make intentional efforts to engage underrepresented individuals and ensure the research is beneficial to all community members.

Для цитирования: Amendola Alyssa, Bright Melissa, Ortega Diana. Engaging the National Youth Football Community in a Child Sexual Abuse Research Advisory Board.. Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action. 2026. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2026.a993190.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.