MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.05.014

Медицинская библиотека · Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology · 2017

Radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer: A case series and literature review.

Wu Chin-Jui, Chang Wen-Chun, Chen Chi-Hau, Chen Chi-An, Huang Su-Cheng, Sheu Bor-Ching

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Radical trachelectomy (RT) is an alternative treatment for preserving fertility in patients with cervical cancer. Because women with operable cervical cancer opting for fertility preservation are scarce, few cases have been reported in Taiwan. Here we report our cases series.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated seven patients who underwent vaginal RT and three patients who underwent abdominal RT in a single medical institute for a median follow-up period of 5 years.

RESULTS

The oncological outcome was highly satisfactory. All patients survived and are currently disease-free, except for two who had recurrence and received additional concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Other complications included urinary tract infection, cervical stenosis, and unilateral hydronephrosis. All complications were manageable with little long-term effects. However, no pregnancy was observed during the 5-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

RT is considered a complicated surgical procedure among gynecological operations. Here we review the literature and describe several factors associated with higher pregnancy rates.

Для цитирования: Wu Chin-Jui, Chang Wen-Chun, Chen Chi-Hau, Chen Chi-An, Huang Su-Cheng, Sheu Bor-Ching. Radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer: A case series and literature review.. Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.05.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.