MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1128/aac.23.4.565

Медицинская библиотека · Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1983

Clinical evaluation of moxalactam: evidence of decreased efficacy in gram-positive aerobic infections.

Salzer W, Pegram P S, McCall C E

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Moxalactam was used as initial, empirical therapy in 69 patients with a variety of serious bacterial infections, 32% of which were accompanied by bacteremia. Overall, the success rate was 83% and drug-related adverse effects were minimal. The drug was less efficacious in infections caused by aerobic gram-positive pathogens than it was in those caused by gram-negative pathogens. The following gram-positive organisms were associated with special problems during moxalactam therapy: Streptococcus pneumoniae (development of meningitis and a relapse of pneumonia with a more resistant strain), Staphylococcus epidermidis (in vivo emergence of moxalactam resistance, and the enterococci (failure of therapy and a fatal superinfection. Moxalactam performed well in infections caused by most gram-negative organisms, including aminoglycoside-resistant strains, but the previously reported emergence of gram-negative bacillary resistance to moxalactam during therapy was reconfirmed in our series with Serratia marcescens. The use of moxalactam in the treatment of gram-negative meningitis was further supported by a patient with meningitis-ventriculitis caused by Bacteroides fragilis who was cured with moxalactam after failure on chloramphenicol.

Для цитирования: Salzer W, Pegram P S, McCall C E. Clinical evaluation of moxalactam: evidence of decreased efficacy in gram-positive aerobic infections.. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1983. DOI: 10.1128/aac.23.4.565.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.