MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90129-4

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 1980

Laparotomy for pelvic fracture.

Zannis V J, Wood M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To establish criteria for laparotomy, the records of 224 patients admitted with an acute pelvic fracture were reviewed. Forty-four patients underwent laparotomy; 2 had no intraabdominal injury. The mechanisms of injury was blunt trauma in 31 patients and gunshot wound in 13. All four patients who died had blunt trauma. Major or minor pelvic fracture classification did not predict intraabdominal visceral injury, except for bilateral pubic rami fractures, which were commonly associated with bladder rupture. The accuracy of the indications for laparotomy was calcualted and criteria were established. Signs of an acute abdominal disorder, the presence of a penetrating wound, abnormal findings on pyleography or cystography, persistent shock, evisceration, and diminished distal pulses, singly or in combination, had a 90 percent accuracy in indicating correctable traabdominal injury. Peritoneal lavage was less reliable, with a 57 percent accuracy. Additional criteria to be considered are enlarging palpable abdominal hematoma, fracture or dislocation with bony fragments protruding into the pelvis, signs of persistent bleeding, and rectal injury or a large perineal wound.

Для цитирования: Zannis V J, Wood M. Laparotomy for pelvic fracture.. American journal of surgery. 1980. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90129-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.