Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026
Comparing Minimally Invasive Modified Levator vs. Conjoint Fascia Sheath-Levator Suspension in Correcting Severe Congenital Ptosis.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Shan-Yan, Bai Jian-Shu, Zhang Yun-Han, Wu Yi-Ming, Guo Qian-Qian, Tian Rui
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical efficacy and differences between minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension surgeries in correcting severe congenital ptosis.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 40 patients with severe congenital ptosis, of whom 22 (25 eyes) and 18 (21 eyes) underwent minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension, respectively. Palpebral fissure height, marginal reflex distance 1, scleral exposure, and eyelid mobility at 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively were compared between the surgical groups.
RESULTS: The overall correction rates did not differ significantly between the minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension surgeries (88% vs. 66.67%). At 1 month postoperatively, the average scleral exposure was significantly lower in the modified levator palpebrae complex group than in the conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex group (1.28 ± 1.29 mm vs. 2.17 ± 0.96 mm). Additionally, at both 1 and 3 months postoperatively, eyelid mobility was significantly greater in the modified levator palpebrae complex group than that observed in the conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex group (6.84 ± 1.16 mm and 7.08 ± 1.18 mm vs. 5.54 ± 1.43 mm and 5.91 ± 1.69 mm).
CONCLUSION: Both minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension surgeries effectively correct severe congenital ptosis; however, the former demonstrates superior eyelid mobility and closure function recovery as postoperative outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 40 patients with severe congenital ptosis, of whom 22 (25 eyes) and 18 (21 eyes) underwent minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension, respectively. Palpebral fissure height, marginal reflex distance 1, scleral exposure, and eyelid mobility at 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively were compared between the surgical groups.
RESULTS: The overall correction rates did not differ significantly between the minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension surgeries (88% vs. 66.67%). At 1 month postoperatively, the average scleral exposure was significantly lower in the modified levator palpebrae complex group than in the conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex group (1.28 ± 1.29 mm vs. 2.17 ± 0.96 mm). Additionally, at both 1 and 3 months postoperatively, eyelid mobility was significantly greater in the modified levator palpebrae complex group than that observed in the conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex group (6.84 ± 1.16 mm and 7.08 ± 1.18 mm vs. 5.54 ± 1.43 mm and 5.91 ± 1.69 mm).
CONCLUSION: Both minimally invasive modified levator palpebrae complex and conjoint fascia sheath-levator muscle complex suspension surgeries effectively correct severe congenital ptosis; however, the former demonstrates superior eyelid mobility and closure function recovery as postoperative outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .