DOI 10.1097/apo.0000000000000246
Factors Predictive of Subretinal Fluid Resolution in Coats Disease: Analysis of 177 Eyes in 177 Patients at a Single Center.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate factors predictive of subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution in Coats disease.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS
Institutional review board-approved review of patients diagnosed with Coats disease demonstrating SRF (stage 3-5) at a single center from November 1973 to July 2018 with comparison of eyes that had resolution of SRF to those in which SRF persisted.
RESULTS
There were 177 cases (154 males, 87%) of Coats disease diagnosed at a mean age of 8 years. After a mean follow-up of 62 months, SRF resolved in 110 (62%) and persisted in 67 (38%) eyes. Comparison (resolved SRF vs persistent SRF) revealed classification as stage 3A [63 (57%) vs 20 (29%)], stage 3B [47 (43%) vs 40 (60%)], or stage 4 [0 (0%) vs 7 (11%)] (P < 0.001). Eyes with resolved SRF presented with fewer clock hours of telangiectasia (mean: 5 vs 7 clock hours, P < 0.001), light bulb aneurysms (mean: 5 vs 7 clock hours, P < 0.001), exudation (mean: 7 vs 10 clock hours, P < 0.001), and extent of SRF (mean: 7 vs 10 clock hours, P < 0.001). Factors predictive of SRF resolution included absence of iris neovascularization on fluorescein angiography [odds ratio 0.05 (95% confidence interval 0.01-0.60), P = 0.02], and less elevated SRF by ultrasonography [odds ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.95), P = 0.004). For every 1-mm decrease in SRF, likelihood of SRF resolution increased by 16%.
CONCLUSIONS
Resolution of SRF was achieved in the majority of eyes (62%) with stage 3 to 5 Coats disease. Predictors of SRF resolution included lack of neovascularization on fluorescein angiography and less elevation of SRF by ultrasonography.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.