Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023
Practical Classification and Management of Accessory Auricle.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Qingqing, Sheng Yang, Jiang Zhiyuan, Cui Wei, Cai Zhen, Chen Zaihong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accessory auricle is a common congenital abnormal auricular appendage with various forms of presentation. The authors proposed a practical classification system based on the involved anatomical subunits (tragus, the anterior notch and the intertragal notch) and described the corresponding surgical procedures.
METHODS: The authors reviewed and analyzed 80 patients (96 ears) who underwent accessory auricle excisions form January 2018 to December 2021. Accessory auricles were classified into three categories: simple (no deformed subunits), complex (several deformed subunits) and compound (coexistence of simple and complex type). The complex type was subclassified into notch and tragal subtypes. The tragal subtype was subclassified into subtype A, B and C, according to the location, contour and size of the involved tragus. Surgical methods were described, and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Simple type was the most common type (54%) and compound type was less common (15%). In addition, there were 28 (29%) tragal subtype accessory auricles and 2 (2%) notch subtype. Among the tragal subtype, A was the most commonly observed (25%), followed by B (2%) and C (2%). Patients were followed for an average of 11.3 months. One patient experienced delayed wound healing and 6 patients showed hypertrophic scars. The average aesthetic score, evaluated by a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent), was 3.67 ± 0.06 points. The OSAS and PSAS scores were 9.29 ± 0.44 and 10.84 ± 0.40, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The innovative classification system of accessory auricles can reflect whether there was a combined deformity and the deformed subunits, and guide decisions on surgical approaches.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
METHODS: The authors reviewed and analyzed 80 patients (96 ears) who underwent accessory auricle excisions form January 2018 to December 2021. Accessory auricles were classified into three categories: simple (no deformed subunits), complex (several deformed subunits) and compound (coexistence of simple and complex type). The complex type was subclassified into notch and tragal subtypes. The tragal subtype was subclassified into subtype A, B and C, according to the location, contour and size of the involved tragus. Surgical methods were described, and postoperative outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: Simple type was the most common type (54%) and compound type was less common (15%). In addition, there were 28 (29%) tragal subtype accessory auricles and 2 (2%) notch subtype. Among the tragal subtype, A was the most commonly observed (25%), followed by B (2%) and C (2%). Patients were followed for an average of 11.3 months. One patient experienced delayed wound healing and 6 patients showed hypertrophic scars. The average aesthetic score, evaluated by a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = excellent), was 3.67 ± 0.06 points. The OSAS and PSAS scores were 9.29 ± 0.44 and 10.84 ± 0.40, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The innovative classification system of accessory auricles can reflect whether there was a combined deformity and the deformed subunits, and guide decisions on surgical approaches.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .